Wuthering
Heights as portrayed by the movies and popular culture:
Conceit number 1: ‘Wuthering Heights is a book about love
and romance’. It is not. Most definitely not.
Conceit number 2: ‘Heathcliff
and Cathy are star-crossed lovers who are meant for one-another, and whose
struggle to be together, even beyond death, forms the basis of the story’. Really,
this is so far from the truth I clench my fists in frustration at the very
thought that people might actually think this. Pick Romeo and Juliet; pick
Lizzie Bennet and Mister Darcy; heck, pick Gomez and Morticia if you really
want to, but Cathy and Heathcliff are not the perfect couple, not by a long
shot, and the book is largely made by the radioactive fallout of their
inability to function as rational people.
Wuthering Heights by
Emily Brontë, younger sister of Charlotte and thus one of the fabulous Brontë
set, is a dark dark book. Not the pitiful Comic Book style of dark, or grim in the sense of horror,
but the sickening kind of dark that eats away at you as you watch functioning
human beings growing steadily more twisted and horrible as the story saunters
on, daring you to believe it can’t possibly keep up this trail of misery and
decadence, only to laugh as it twists another knife in somebody’s gut. It’s a
bit like Eastenders in that case.
The story takes place on the bleak moors of the north,
something of a rugged wasteland if the book is to be believed, back in that
lovely Georgian era that Jane Austen seems so keen to glorify. There are but
two man-made locations to explore – the titular Wuthering Heights which is a rustic early-modern pile of stones
owned by the Earnshaw family, and Thrushcross Grange, the large domain of the
much more posh Linton family. Aside from a village somewhere in the distance,
these two houses represent the sole habitation of the region. Mister Lockwood,
a newcomer to the neighbourhood, arrives at Wuthering Heights to find a rather
unfortunate tangled knot of human beings; an incomprehensible and sadistic old
retainer, a rough young man, an unhappy young lady, and presiding over it all
is the surly, middle-aged and unwelcoming landlord, Mister Heathcliff, and his
pack of half-murderous dogs. Of the relations between these characters, our
Mister Lockwood can’t make heads nor tails – each and every one of them seem to
hate one another. A couple of chapters in, Lockwood stumbles upon the
metaphorical ghost of some Catherine or other, and winds up ill and bedbound,
with only the stories of his housekeeper to occupy his time and energy.
This housekeeper, Mrs Ellen Dean – often known as Nelly –
turns out to be intimate with the entire sordid history of Heathcliff,
Catherine, and the troubles they caused. In a confusing shift of narrative,
Nelly in essence becomes the protagonist, telling of how the orphaned child
Heathcliff was brought to Wuthering Heights one day by old Mister Earnshaw, how
he befriended his adoptive father’s daughter Catherine/Cathy and made enemies
with his son Hindley; then when Earnshaw died not long later, and Hindley
succeeded him as master of the family, Heathcliff was degraded to the level of
household labourer and forced into squalor. Cathy’s companionship was his only
pleasure in life, and that was quickly taken away from him when she ends up
marrying Edgar Linton, the rich-kid of the neighbourhood – causing Heathcliff
to run away never to return. Only he does return, years later, now with a bit
of cash to his name and a dream of revenge against literally everybody who had
ever wronged him in the slightest way. The following three quarters of the
book, and about two decades of plot, consist of just that.
The character roster contains some of the most dreadful and
unpleasant human beings to appear this side of English Literature. Catherine
Earnshaw, who thankfully dies before the halfway mark of the story, is no
perfect princess – she’s not the nastiest character, but manages with a number
of badly thought out words and actions to send the entire plot spiralling out
of control. However she rationalises marrying Linton, she proves later on how
manipulative, selfish and slightly crazy she is when Heathcliff comes back and
rocks the boat. On top of that is her brother, whose earlier cruelty to
Heathcliff is matched by his ensuing slide into drunkenness and gambling which
essentially ruins him; Hindley’s neglected son Hareton (Cathy’s nephew) who
spends his childhood as an uncouth, vile-mouthed little toad; there’s Joseph,
the bible-bashing old sinner who loves the idea of Hell much more than any
soppy old thing like Heaven; there’s the weak-willed and foppish Edgar Linton
and his stupid sister Isabella; and finally the sickly offspring of Heathcliff
and Isabella Linton, their son who just goes by the name of Linton (as if the
names couldn’t get any more confusing), pathetic, grasping, selfish, snobbish,
and cowardly.
But of all these disgusting creatures, there is none more
frightful or monstrous than Heathcliff himself. Now, each of the characters in Wuthering Heights is a fully developed
entity, packed with understandable motives, a degree of sympathy, and one or
two features which could go part the way to redeeming them for their many flaws
– after all, Hindley Earnshaw did lose his wife, Edgar Linton is actually a fairly
decent guy it turns out, and Catherine Earnshaw had done what she thought was
right, rationalising her marriage to Edgar as if it was the best thing for
everybody. Heathcliff likewise begins quite understandably; a street urchin who
suddenly finds he has a home and a loving family, only to have that taken from
him not long later to be replaced by a life of degradation and servitude, whose
only consolation is the friendship and love of Cathy, who then goes off and
selfishly marries some guy who has money and social status. You can see why he
might be a bit pissed off. But whereas somebody else ought to be able to just
get over a broken heart, run off and start a new life, Heathcliff gets his
hands on some money and comes back with only revenge on his mind, revenge
against the two families which he now holds an inconsolable grudge against.
This essentially involves playing the part of the cuckoo.
Using Hindley Earnshaw’s debts, Heathcliff manoeuvres himself into a position
of essential ownership over Wuthering Heights, and uses that as his base from
which to launch a campaign of aggression against the Lintons; first merely
getting into regular contact with Catherine, through which to irritate her
husband Edgar, then when he realises how Edgar’s sister Isabella has fallen in
love with him, he sees just how badly he can use the intertwining family
relationships to his advantage. Isabella is a bit silly for throwing herself on
this sworn enemy of her family, but Heathcliff’s conduct in using her as a mere
pawn in his grand scheme, and making her miserable seemingly just for the
pleasure of it, is not what anybody deserves. Heathcliff subjects her to near
constant isolation and domestic abuse, until she finally runs away to give
birth to their sickly son Linton.
It’s around this point that the various weak-fisted movie
adaptations begin to lose faith in the story. The older generation are
beginning to die off; Catherine being the first to go, sickening as though
Heathcliff himself is acting as poison to her, and finally slipping away with
the birth of hers and Edgar’s daughter, also named Catherine/Cathy
(confusingly). Her brother Hindley Earnshaw, Heathcliff’s old tormentor and now
dependent, also dies around this time, allowing Cliffy to seize the Heights in
fullness and train up Hindley’s son, Hareton, as his dogsbody. After the three
children grow older, Isabella Linton dies thus resulting in Heathcliff gaining
custody of his son, Linton. With me so far? Good, because Stage Two of the plan
commences: the younger Catherine comes into Heathcliff’s sights, and he now
knows that by manipulating and forcing the children into a marriage alliance,
he can not only inflict more misery on a second generation of the two families
but he can also gain control of Thrushcross Grange. With Edgar Linton on his
deathbed, and Linton Heathcliff (Jr. Jr.) not likely to outlive him by much,
our bad guy ends up being diabolically efficient in getting his way – resorting
to kidnapping and imprisonment, and even bribing a solicitor.
So basically Heathcliff is the villain of the tale – a ‘bad
guy’ in both senses of the phrase. The dull and ordinarily miserable lives of
the characters are upset and overturned purely by the hand of this wicked
nemesis, this antagonist; and the more pain and suffering that he causes, the
less we feel any sympathy for him – or at least that’s how we should feel, and
I hereby declare any Heathcliff Apologists to be making a ridiculous argument.
At any time he could have laid off his relentless assault, asked for
forgiveness and left the world as it should be, but no; he pursues his war
against the Lintons long after Catherine’s (the senior Cathy’s) death, when he
ought to have had some kind of epiphany, but which instead spurs him on to
battle Edgar to the death and corrupt the next generation. And if there is
to be a hero of this tale, then the closest we have is Nelly Dean, the
protagonist through whose eyes we witness all this awful stuff happen. Mister
Lockwood may be writing the tale, but Nelly is the one telling it (or should
that figure of speech be the other way round?). She is superstitious and
meddlesome, and sometimes her interventions cause more harm than good, but at
the end of the day she is doing stuff, trying to do the right thing, and she
seems to at least have a sense of human decency to her. The later part of the
book feels as though it’s her and Cathy (Jr.) struggling directly against
Heathcliff, and one can’t help but feel sorry for them, having to stand up to
such a monster – a fight which you feel sure they are going to lose. In the
end, Heathcliff’s eventual death is the only real way for the surviving
characters to find peace and joy; though the villain’s strange decline shows
that perhaps all this wickedness was having an adverse effect on him after all.
Who knows. It’s a strange finale, and I’m sure one would be better served in
seeking out literary criticism of the book than in paying heed to a casual
review such as this.
So would I recommend this? I would indeed; it’s a bloody
good book, written with the skill and devotion you would expect from a Brontë,
though it’s not an easy nor pleasant read. The subject matter is as dark as it
gets, and if you wanted a love story then you won’t like this one bit – not
unless you’re sick and twisted. Admittedly I did not enjoy it like I did Jane Eyre, but then, it’s a very
different tale – one is actually about love, and quite good at telling it,
while the other is a tale of hatred, of suffering, and of powerlessness. Mister
Rochester is a good man who has his faults and things to hide, while Heathcliff
is a vindictive monster who delights in inflicting pain and misery on people
who never wronged him in the first place.
Like all Georgio-Victorian literature it takes a great deal
of time and energy to ingest, but it is by all means worth it. Certainly more
so than Pride and Prejudice, which
ultimately does not amount to much – the Brontës on the other hand actually
give us a fresh and interesting story, populated with richly woven characters
and containing themes stronger than a mere ‘marry a man with lots of cash’;
this is about people in the middle of nowhere, driven to each other’s throats
by their most awful human failings, and it makes for a memorable tale. A tale,
at least, that was ignored by Laurence Olivier and many others, I’m sure, who
attempted to adapt it for film. If there’s nothing else you take away from this
review, then it is that Heathcliff is not some moody romantic, but is one of
the most evil men in English literature.
Bibliothing Heights
Brontë, Emily. Wuthering Heights. Alexander Hamilton
Publishers (c.1940-47 [First Published 1847])
No comments:
Post a Comment